Treasury and the IRS issued proposed regulations on September 3, 2026, addressing racial nondiscrimination as a condition of federal tax exempt status for private schools under IRC Section 501(c)(3). The proposed rule updates longstanding IRS guidance to reflect current Supreme Court jurisprudence and would apply to tax years beginning on or after May 31, 2027. Treasury and the IRS estimate the proposal may affect as many as 18,000 private educational institutions.
For counsel advising exempt organizations in the education space, this is a compliance project, not a headline. The window between publication of the proposed rule and the May 31, 2027 effective date is the review and revision period, and the review should be starting now.
The legal foundation the release cites
The release grounds the proposed rule in three Supreme Court decisions:
Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), which held that racial segregation in public education violates the Equal Protection Clause.
Bob Jones University v. United States, 461 U.S. 574 (1983), which held that a private school’s racially discriminatory admissions policies disqualified it from Section 501(c)(3) status because entitlement to exemption is conditioned on compliance with fundamental public policy.
Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College, 600 U.S. 181 (2023), which held that race conscious admissions programs at Harvard and the University of North Carolina violated the Equal Protection Clause and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act.
The proposed regulations position the exempt status inquiry consistent with the Bob Jones doctrine as informed by the Students for Fair Admissions holding on race conscious admissions.
The operative rule as stated in the release
Under the proposed rule, a private school would not qualify for federal tax exempt status under Section 501(c)(3) if it adopts, maintains, or enforces a policy or practice that discriminates on the basis of race, color, or national or ethnic origin. The rule would apply across:
Admissions.
Educational policies.
Scholarships and loans.
Athletics.
Every other school administered or school supported program.
The proposal covers tax exempt private primary and secondary schools, colleges, universities, professional schools, and trade schools.
The proposal would also eliminate provisions of older IRS guidance (developed under a prior administrative framework) that had permitted schools to favor certain racial classifications in admissions, facilities, programs, scholarships, and financial assistance. Treasury and the IRS have concluded that those provisions are inconsistent with a uniform nondiscrimination standard.
Two important carve outs
Religious mission preserved. The proposal would not prevent a private school from maintaining a religious mission, curriculum, or program of religious observance. Religious schools may continue to select students based on genuine religious affiliation or membership consistent with existing federal law. The distinction counsel will need to draw is between selection criteria tied to actual religious affiliation or membership and criteria that use religion as a proxy for race, color, or national or ethnic origin.
Race neutral criteria still available. The proposal allows schools to continue expanding educational opportunity to assist disadvantaged students using race neutral criteria. The release specifically identifies:
Family income.
Geographic location.
First generation status.
Individual hardship.
Military family status.
Academic achievement.
Schools may not, however, make decisions or confer benefits on the basis of race, color, or national or ethnic origin. Counsel advising institutions with existing diversity or opportunity programs will need to review each program to determine whether the operative criteria are genuinely race neutral or whether race is the operative factor by design.
Why this matters for tax pros
Eight practice level takeaways for counsel and advisors to exempt educational institutions.
First, treat this as a board level compliance project. Section 501(c)(3) status is the financial and operational foundation of every private school on the exempt organization roster. Loss of exemption exposes the institution to income tax on net income, loss of deductibility for donor contributions under Section 170, potential loss of state tax exempt status and property tax exemption, and often loss of eligibility for tax exempt bond financing. This is a board fiduciary matter, not a curriculum committee matter.
Second, run the comprehensive policy inventory before year end. Every institutional policy, program, and practice that touches admissions, financial aid, scholarships, athletics, student clubs, faculty hiring, curriculum, and school administered events should be reviewed against the proposed rule. That includes:
Admissions policies and outreach programs.
Scholarship criteria (both institutional scholarships and third party scholarships administered through the school).
Financial aid formulas and priority categories.
Diversity, equity, and inclusion offices, if any, and their program budgets.
Athletic recruitment and team composition policies.
Named awards and honors programs.
Study abroad and exchange programs.
Faculty and staff hiring policies (also subject to Title VII and other frameworks, but relevant here to the exempt purpose analysis).
Housing assignments and dormitory affinity groups.
Third, revise scholarship and financial aid criteria to race neutral formulations where race has been the operative factor. Institutions with scholarships restricted by race, or with scholarships that reference race as one factor among several, should identify whether the underlying donor intent can be satisfied with a race neutral criterion (income, first generation status, geographic origin) that reaches the intended population. Where the original scholarship instrument was drafted with race explicit language, counsel may need to evaluate cy pres or other trust modification pathways under state law.
Fourth, document the religious mission distinction with care. Religious schools relying on the religious affiliation or membership carve out should have contemporaneous documentation of the religious criterion, the religious basis for the criterion, and the neutral application of the criterion across applicants. A criterion that is race neutral on paper but administered in a way that produces racial exclusion will not survive scrutiny.
Fifth, coordinate with Title VI compliance where applicable. Schools receiving federal financial assistance are already subject to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin. The proposed 501(c)(3) rule is a separate compliance framework, and the two do not fully overlap. Institutions covered by Title VI should build the Section 501(c)(3) review into the existing Title VI compliance program, not treat it as an alternative.
Sixth, prepare for the comment window. Proposed regulations are subject to notice and comment under the Administrative Procedure Act. The proposed regulations are available on the Federal Register public inspection page cited in the release, and comment instructions and the comment deadline will be published with the Federal Register notice itself. Institutions with fact patterns not clearly addressed by the proposal (particularly religious schools, single sex schools, schools serving specific national origin or ethnic communities where the mission itself is tied to that community, and schools with historical charter provisions) should consider submitting comments through counsel.
Seventh, watch for interaction with state law. Some states have laws or state constitutional provisions that require or encourage race conscious approaches in education, particularly around desegregation orders, magnet school programs, or state funded scholarships. Schools navigating a state law obligation that appears in tension with the federal proposed rule should engage counsel to work through the sequencing and any preemption analysis before revising policies.
Eighth, prepare boards and donors for the transition. The May 31, 2027 effective date is a real timeline for policy revision, but the public conversation around institutional policy changes often runs on a longer timeline. Boards should be briefed now, donor stewardship conversations for affected scholarships should be initiated, and public communications should be planned rather than reactive.
Legal posture and reliance
Proposed regulations do not have the force of final regulations. Institutions cannot rely on the proposed rule as authoritative until the final rule is issued, and Treasury and the IRS retain the ability to revise the proposal in response to comments before finalization. Counsel should treat the proposal as the government’s stated direction and the framework against which institutions should begin planning, but should preserve the analysis under existing law until the final rule publishes.
Counsel should also note that Section 501(c)(3) status is enforced primarily through the IRS examination and revocation process, subject to judicial review under Section 7428 for organizations denied or losing exempt status. Any loss of exempt status in the future would follow that procedural framework.
THE TTR TAKE
For counsel to private schools, the review is broader than admissions. Every scholarship, athletic program, financial aid formula, and school administered event now sits on the compliance checklist. Institutions with a genuine religious mission have a preserved pathway. Institutions relying on race conscious diversity programs will need a clear compliance plan and a documented transition to race neutral criteria before May 31, 2027.
The Tax Room: For Tax Professionals. Real updates. Real strategy. Real conversations behind the work. Got a story worth sharing? Submit your story today
Direct link to the official Internal Revenue Service announcement.